“Você sabe que eu te amo”: The error committed by tens of millions

Notes on the conflict between standard grammar and real life

“Você sabe que eu te amo” is surely being said at this very moment, somewhere in this immense country. A declaration of love—beautiful, pure, so deeply desired—and wrong! Wrong, according to traditional grammar, because it is a construction that sins by mixing two forms of address, “você” and “tu,” forcing a union between two forms that, by the rules, should never have met.

Almost no one in Brazil will say “você sabe que eu o (or a) amo,” which would be the prescribed form by grammar for this declaration. Anyone who tries to bypass the problem by saying “você sabe que eu lhe amo” will remain at odds with current norms, since the verb to love (amar) is a direct transitive verb. For the majority of Brazilians—as indicated by studies from the Atlas Linguístico do Brasil project, which show a much higher frequency of “você” over “tu” in everyday speech—it’s a dead end, except that hardly anyone notices. Almost no one, that is, because that’s exactly the case we’re about to discuss here.

Although “você” has largely replaced “tu” in much of Brazil, the pronoun “te” has remained alive in spoken language. The result is a hybrid system in which historically distinct forms of treatment have come to coexist in the same sentence: “você” acts as the subject, but “te” remains there, a remnant of a “tu” that is no longer spoken aloud. It is precisely this hybridism that explains why constructions like “Você sabe que eu te amo” sound perfectly natural in predominant everyday usage here, despite coming into conflict with normative grammar.

IN THE LAND OF “TU”

A pertinent question would be: is it like this in Portugal too? The answer is an emphatic no—and the reason reveals that Brazilian hybridism is not universal to Portuguese, but rather our own peculiarity. The use of these two pronouns of address there is so different from the usual one here that it is almost the reverse: while in Brazil “você” is more popular, in Portugal it is “tu” that predominates. “Você” in European Portuguese is much less frequent in daily life, and can sound cold or distant in certain contexts—and, in others, even rude. In the motherland of the language, the mixing of “tu” and “você” in the same sentence is much less tolerated and sounds more like an error than a colloquial register.

This difference between the two variants leads us to a dilemma: if we are faced with the need to translate a phrase like “You know I love you,” how should we proceed? Respect the rule and produce something that would sound strange (“você sabe que eu o/a amo” or else “tu sabes que eu te amo”) or create something “natural,” even if technically incorrect?

THE TRANSLATOR’S DILEMMA

To answer, it is necessary to turn to translation theory. What is the objective of this human activity? One possible answer, according to Dynamic Equivalence Theory, formulated by American linguist Eugene Nida (1914–2011), is that translation should seek to produce in the reader of the target language an effect equivalent to that experienced by the reader of the source text. If this is the purpose, preserving the intention, tone, and emotion of the message can be more important than literally reproducing the grammatical structure of the source text.

In practice, however, everything will depend on the context of the translation and the public for which it is intended. Period characters or formal environments may justify a more “correct” and grammatical language, whereas everyday dialogues require the translator to be a traitor to grammar in order to be faithful to real life (and to the author’s intention). For this reason, “Você sabe que eu te amo,” the most romantic error in the Portuguese language, is right even while being wrong.

Advertising, incidentally, resolved this impasse long ago, setting aside grammatical scruples: “Vem pra Caixa você também!” (“Come to Caixa you too!”), and no one finds it strange, because the phrase sounds like speech, not like a rule.

In translation, the problem is often not in the source language, but in the target language. The good translator knows how to recognize when strict observance of the standard norm compromises the oral nature of dialogue. And they are one of the few professionals (along with fiction writers and advertisers) who have the literary license to “get grammar wrong” in the name of naturalness.

This, however, changes completely in sworn translation, as well as in legal, academic, technical, or administrative texts, where the standard norm takes priority. But here, we are talking about love.

Se você estivesse traduzindo um romance para leitores brasileiros, escreveria “Você sabe que eu te amo” ou “Você sabe que eu o (ou a) amo”?

Deixe sua opinião nos comentários!